|
Here is the original letter to Len where the ATF found that the BM3000 "does not constitute the frame or receiver of a firearm" (pg. 2) |
 |
 |
 |
| 9 months later this same device - with no changes - has mysteriously morphed into a "Machinegun" |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| In Response to this Letter, Len wrote the ATF asking for more clarification |
 |
 |
|
Three (3) months later the ATF sent Len this response Note: Letter was actually received by Len on August 21, 2006 |
 |
 |
